This contribution presents a reconstruction of the way the concepts of sadism and masochism were introduced and anchored in psychoanalytic metapsychology. It focuses on the first two editions of Freud's Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. Freud's singular indebtedness to Krafft-Ebing's Psychopathia Sexualis is emphasized. Subsequently, it is argued that Freud's selective reading of Krafft-Ebing is determined by the former's model of hysteria. Hysteria functions as the Procrustean bed onto which both sadism and masochism are forced by Freud at that time. It is argued that Freud in fact fails to give an adequate account of sadism and masochism in his Three Essays. Moreover, even in his later work, sadism and masochism remain conceptually problematic passe-partout concepts, which are used in order to get to grips with human aggression.

中文翻译：

---

歇斯底里地壳上的虐待狂和受虐狂：从性精神病到性理论的三篇论文

这一贡献提出了对虐待狂和受虐狂概念的引入和锚定在精神分析超心理学中的方式的重构。它侧重于弗洛伊德关于性理论的三篇论文的前两个版本。强调了弗洛伊德对克拉夫特·艾宾的《性病的精神病》的特殊欠债。随后，有人认为弗洛伊德对克拉夫特-埃宾的选择性阅读是由前者的歇斯底里模型决定的。歇斯底里起着普罗斯特式的作用，当时弗洛伊德强迫施虐和受虐。有人认为，弗洛伊德实际上没有在他的《三篇散文》中对虐待狂和受虐狂作出足够的说明。而且，即使在他后来的作品中，虐待狂和受虐狂在概念上仍然是有问题的passe-partout概念，