当前位置: X-MOL 学术Planning Theory › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The politics of value in urban development: Valuing conflict in agonistic pluralism
Planning Theory ( IF 3.627 ) Pub Date : 2019-03-01 , DOI: 10.1177/1473095219831381
Cameron McAuliffe 1 , Dallas Rogers 2
Affiliation  

In this article, we consider the role of value pluralism in theorising urban development and the politics of participatory planning. Rather than situating analyses of urban development in a monist or universalist ethics, where values are reducible to a single universal (e.g. human rights), or a normative pluralism based on the tension between different bearers of political value (e.g. liberty and equality), we argue for a plural ethics to make sense of the complex empirical reality of our cities. Post-consensus theories of planning treat the presence of conflict as an enduring reality in urban development, with Chantal Mouffe providing one way of conceptualising a productive politics of conflict. We extend Mouffe’s plural politics through an appeal to value pluralism in the form of anthropological theories of value. A better understanding of the plural and incommensurable nature of values not only contributes to our understanding of the operation of agonistic pluralism, it also provides a more robust theoretical account of how different urban actors in the city transition from antagonism to agonism, which Mouffe suggests is necessary for a more inclusive urban politics. The politics of value resides in the struggle for legitimacy of particular regimes of value; not just to determine economic value, but to define what value is, and how different values dominate, encompass or otherwise relate to one another. This moral politics approach, via value theory, provides one way of tracing an ethical urbanism that exists between conflict and consensus. It allows us to reframe the central challenge of agonistic pluralism as the transition from antagonistic positions, marked by moral intransigence and immutability, towards more flexible value positions that allow ‘adversaries’ to enter into a viable agonistic politics.

中文翻译:

城市发展中的价值政治:在竞争多元主义中重视冲突

在本文中,我们考虑了价值多元化在理论上城市发展和参与性规划政治中的作用。我们不是以一元论或普世主义伦理学来分析城市发展,而是将价值观还原为单一的普世性(例如人权),或者基于不同政治价值承担者之间的张力(例如自由和平等)来规范性多元化。主张多元伦理,以理解我们城市复杂的经验现实。协商一致后的规划理论将冲突的存在视为城市发展中的持久现实,而尚塔尔·穆菲(Chantal Mouffe)提供了一种概念化生产性冲突政治的方法。我们通过对人类价值论形式的价值多元化的呼吁来扩展穆菲的多元政治。对价值的多元性和无与伦比的性质的更好理解,不仅有助于我们对激动性多元主义的运作方式的理解,而且还提供了更强有力的理论解释,说明城市中不同的城市参与者如何从对立向激动过渡,穆菲认为这是。对于更具包容性的城市政治而言是必要的。价值政治在于为特定价值制度的合法性而斗争。不仅要确定经济价值,还要确定什么是价值,以及不同的价值如何相互支配,包含或以其他方式相互联系。通过价值理论,这种道德政治方法提供了一种追踪冲突和共识之间存在的道德都市主义的方式。它使我们能够将对抗性多元主义的主要挑战重新构架为从对立立场的转变,
更新日期:2019-03-01
down
wechat
bug