The purpose of this article is to offer planning scholars a basis for criticizing authoritarian populism and not limiting ideological critique to neoliberalism. Authoritarian populism is anti-elitist, anti-pluralist and excluding in that the authentic people includes only part of the population. Authoritarian populists imagine a homogeneous people whose will determines policy. The article deals with confrontations and contact points between communicative planning theory and populist currents. It distils several core themes from five authoritative collections of works on planning theory and examines their relations with populist ideas. Authoritarian populism is an incomplete ideology that can fuse with various other ideologies. Amalgamations of populism and neoliberalism pose new challenges to participatory planning. Authoritarian populism criticizes planning institutions for blocking the immediate realization of the will of the people and being sympathetic to social diversity and cultural influence threatening heartland values. Neoliberalism is opposed to the welfare policies, equity goals, growth restrictions and other public interventions associated with spatial planning. Joint pressure from the two ideologies may alter the planning of liberal democracies in an autocratic direction.

中文翻译：

---

民粹主义者和计划者：“我们是人民。你是谁？'*

本文的目的是为规划学者提供批评独裁民粹主义的基础，而不是将意识形态批判限制为新自由主义。威权民粹主义是反精英主义者，反多元主义者，排除在外的是，真实的人只包括一部分人口。独裁的民粹主义者想象一个由同质的人决定政策。本文讨论了沟通计划理论与民粹主义潮流之间的对抗和接触点。它从五个权威的规划理论著作集中散布了几个核心主题，并研究了它们与民粹主义思想的关系。威权民粹主义是不完整的意识形态，可以与其他各种意识形态融合。民粹主义和新自由主义的融合给参与性计划提出了新的挑战。威权民粹主义批评计划机构阻碍了人民意愿的立即实现，并且同情威胁着心脏地带价值的社会多样性和文化影响。新自由主义反对与空间规划有关的福利政策，公平目标，增长限制和其他公共干预措施。两种意识形态的共同压力可能会朝着专制方向改变自由民主制的计划。