Introduction: The purpose of this study was to examine mental health during the coronavirus pandemic crisis and its explanation by personal and national level coping resources This question was examined in the midst of a political crisis in Israel among voters from two different political orientations Method: Questionnaires were delivered to a sample of 396 Israeli Jews, of them 180 (45 5%) right-wing and 216 (54 5%) left-wing voters Right-wing voters presented higher levels of mental health during the crisis as compared to left-wing voters Results: Right-wing voters also reported stronger levels of national coping resources such as sense of national coherence and trust in governmental institutions Moreover, mental health was predicted only by personal resources among left-wing voters, while among the right-wing participants national resources were significant as well Discussion: The results highlight the role of political orientation and low trust in the government as a possible risk factor for mental health even in times of global pandemic crisis

中文翻译：

---

简要报告：全球大流行时期，政治取向能否解释心理健康？冠状病毒危机期间的投票方式，个人和国家应对资源以及心理健康

简介：本研究的目的是检验冠状病毒大流行危机期间的心理健康状况，以及通过个人和国家层面的应对资源进行解释。在以色列发生政治危机期间，来自两个不同政治方向的选民对此问题进行了研究。方法：问卷被送至396名以色列犹太人的样本中，其中180名（45 5％）右翼选民和216名（54 5％）左翼选民在危机期间，右翼选民的心理健康水平高于左翼选民右翼选民结果：右翼选民还报告了更强的国家应对资源水平，例如国家连贯性和对政府机构的信任感。此外，心理健康仅由左翼选民中的个人资源来预测，在右翼参与者中，国家资源也很重要。讨论：结果强调了政治取向和对政府的低信任度即使在全球大流行危机时期也可能是心理健康的风险因素。