当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Journal of Stress Management › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Coping and resilience are differently related depending on the population: A comparison between three clinical samples and the general population.
International Journal of Stress Management ( IF 4.368 ) Pub Date : 2020-08-01 , DOI: 10.1037/str0000156
Helena Garrido-Hernansaiz , Rocío Rodríguez-Rey , Jesús Alonso-Tapia

Different stressors trigger different coping strategies and resilience also varies across adversities. This study aimed to investigate the association between coping strategies and resilience outcomes in different stressful situations. Individuals living with HIV, with cancer, have children with cancer, or from the general population (N = 525) completed measures of resilience (the Brief Resilience Scale) and coping (the Situated Coping Questionnaire for Adults). We examined differences in resilience and in the use of coping strategies across samples with ANOVAs. We obtained highand low-resilience groups for each sample and conducted ANOVAs to study differences in coping strategies. Result showed that resilience was similar across samples, but differences emerged regarding coping strategies (e.g., HIV+ individuals were more likely to use emotional expression and isolation and less likely to seek help). HIV+ highand low-resilience groups used every strategy differently, except for problem-solving and thinking-avoidance. Cancer highand low-resilience groups differed only in rumination. Parents of children with cancer differed in rumination, self-blame, isolation, and positive thinking. General population groups differed in all strategies but help-seeking. In conclusion, different strategies were associated with resilience for each sample, interventions tailored for specific problems should therefore be implemented.

中文翻译:

应对和适应能力因人群而异:三个临床样本与一般人群之间的比较。

不同的压力源会触发不同的应对策略,适应力也因逆境而异。本研究旨在调查不同压力情况下应对策略与复原力结果之间的关联。HIV 感染者、癌症患者、癌症儿童或普通人群 (N = 525) 完成了复原力(简要复原力量表)和应对措施(成人情境应对问卷)。我们通过方差分析检查了样本之间弹性和应对策略使用方面的差异。我们为每个样本获得了高和低弹性组,并进行了方差分析以研究应对策略的差异。结果表明,不同样本的弹性相似,但在应对策略方面出现了差异(例如,HIV+ 者更有可能使用情感表达和孤立,而不太可能寻求帮助)。除了解决问题和避免思考之外,HIV+ 高韧性和低韧性群体对每种策略的使用都不同。癌症高韧性和低韧性组仅在反刍方面有所不同。癌症儿童的父母在反省、自责、孤立和积极思考方面存在差异。除了寻求帮助外,一般人群在所有策略上都不同。总之,不同的策略与每个样本的弹性有关,因此应实施针对特定问题的干预措施。癌症高韧性和低韧性组仅在反刍方面有所不同。癌症儿童的父母在反省、自责、孤立和积极思考方面存在差异。除了寻求帮助外,一般人群在所有策略上都不同。总之,不同的策略与每个样本的弹性有关,因此应实施针对特定问题的干预措施。癌症高韧性和低韧性组仅在反刍方面有所不同。癌症儿童的父母在反省、自责、孤立和积极思考方面存在差异。除了寻求帮助外,一般人群在所有策略上都不同。总之,不同的策略与每个样本的弹性有关,因此应实施针对特定问题的干预措施。
更新日期:2020-08-01
down
wechat
bug