当前位置: X-MOL 学术Asian American Journal of Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Social anxiety in Asian Americans: Integrating personality and cultural factors.
Asian American Journal of Psychology ( IF 1.797 ) Pub Date : 2017-06-01 , DOI: 10.1037/aap0000066
J. Hannah Lee , A. Timothy Church

The purpose of this study was to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of social anxiety in Asian Americans by integrating personality and cultural factors that might affect social anxiety in this population. Asian American adults (N = 255) responded to an online survey, in which they completed measures of the Big Five traits (BFI; Benet-Martínez & John, 1998), Bicultural Identity Integration (BIIS-1; Benet-Martínez & Haritatos, 2005), acculturation and enculturation (AAMAS; Chung, Kim, & Abreu, 2004), and social anxiety (SIAS; Mattick & Clarke, 1998). As hypothesized, the acculturation/enculturation and BII constructs (BII-Conflict and BII-Distance) were fairly independent. When only cultural variables were considered, acculturation and BII-Conflict were comparable predictors of social anxiety. However, only BII-Conflict, and not BII-Distance or acculturation/enculturation, contributed incremental prediction of social anxiety beyond the Big Five traits. An integrated model—in which selected Big Five traits predicted acculturation/enculturation and BII, which, in turn, predicted social anxiety—fit the data well. In this model, Neuroticism had both a direct and indirect effect via BII-Conflict on social anxiety, Extraversion had only a direct effect on social anxiety, and Extraversion and Openness to Experience predicted some of the cultural variables. Overall, the findings support the value of integrating personality and cultural constructs in predicting social anxiety in Asian Americans.

中文翻译:

亚裔美国人的社交焦虑:整合个性和文化因素。

本研究的目的是通过整合可能影响亚裔美国人社交焦虑的个性和文化因素,更全面地了解亚裔美国人的社交焦虑。亚裔美国成年人 (N = 255) 回应了一项在线调查,他们在调查中完成了对五大特质 (BFI; Benet-Martínez & John, 1998)、双文化身份整合 (BIIS-1; Benet-Martínez & Haritatos, 2005)、文化适应和文化适应 (AAMAS; Chung, Kim, & Abreu, 2004),以及社交焦虑 (SIAS; Mattick & Clarke, 1998)。正如假设的那样,文化适应/文化适应和 BII 结构(BII-冲突和 BII-距离)是相当独立的。当只考虑文化变量时,文化适应和 BII-Conflict 是社交焦虑的可比预测因子。但是,只有 BII-Conflict,而不是 BII-Distance 或文化适应/文化适应,对超出五大特征的社交焦虑做出了增量预测。一个综合模型——其中选定的五大特征预测文化适应/文化适应和 BII,反过来预测社交焦虑——很好地拟合了数据。在该模型中,神经质通过 BII-Conflict 对社交焦虑有直接和间接影响,外向性仅对社交焦虑有直接影响,外向性和体验开放性预测了一些文化变量。总体而言,研究结果支持整合个性和文化结构在预测亚裔美国人社交焦虑方面的价值。一个综合模型——其中选定的五大特征预测文化适应/文化适应和 BII,反过来预测社交焦虑——很好地拟合了数据。在该模型中,神经质通过 BII-Conflict 对社交焦虑有直接和间接影响,外向性仅对社交焦虑有直接影响,外向性和体验开放性预测了一些文化变量。总体而言,研究结果支持整合个性和文化结构在预测亚裔美国人社交焦虑方面的价值。一个综合模型——其中选定的五大特征预测文化适应/文化适应和 BII,反过来预测社交焦虑——很好地拟合了数据。在该模型中,神经质通过 BII-Conflict 对社交焦虑有直接和间接影响,外向性仅对社交焦虑有直接影响,外向性和体验开放性预测了一些文化变量。总体而言,研究结果支持整合个性和文化结构在预测亚裔美国人社交焦虑方面的价值。外向性和经验开放性预测了一些文化变量。总体而言,研究结果支持整合个性和文化结构在预测亚裔美国人社交焦虑方面的价值。外向性和经验开放性预测了一些文化变量。总体而言,研究结果支持整合个性和文化结构在预测亚裔美国人社交焦虑方面的价值。
更新日期:2017-06-01
down
wechat
bug