当前位置: X-MOL 学术Advances in Cognitive Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Disrupters as Well as Monitors: Roles of Others During and After Collaborative Remembering in the DRM Procedure
Advances in Cognitive Psychology ( IF 1.217 ) Pub Date : 2019-12-01 , DOI: 10.5709/acp-0275-1
Aiqing Nie , Chunchun Ke , Mengsi Li , Bingyan Guo

Influence of others on true and inauthentic memory both during and after collaborative remembering have drawn extensive attention in recent years. Collaborative research has recorded three typical effects: collaborative inhibition and error pruning (i.e., nominal groups recall more true information but also bear higher erroneous intrusions than collaborative groups) during collaboration, as well as post-collaborative recall benefit after collaboration. This study introduced Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) lists not only to investigate these phenomena in semantically related information, but also set a course to explore false memory in the collaborative context. Another issue is the sensitivity of these effects to different episodic memory tests (i.e., item memory and source memory tests). In views of these, the current study instructed participants to study several DRM lists and then recall previously studied words (item recall) together with their displayed colors (source retrieval) twice (Recall 1 and 2). Recall 1 was performed either individually or collaboratively, whereas Recall 2 was conducted individually. The cost of collaborative inhibition was obtained, along with three different beneficial effects: error pruning, false memory reduction, and post-collaborative recall benefit. Furthermore, the novel implication of the current study is that it reveals the sensitivity of collaborative inhibition and error pruning in DRM lists to testing conditions and demonstrates that the modulation of collaboration on false memory occurs in the same way both during and after collaboration. These results are discussed in terms of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis and other accounts.

中文翻译:

干扰者和监督者:其他人在 DRM 程序中协作记忆期间和之后的角色

近年来,在协作记忆期间和之后,他人对真实和非真实记忆的影响引起了广泛关注。协作研究记录了三种典型的效果:协作期间的协作抑制和错误修剪(即名义群体比协作群体回忆了更多的真实信息,但也承担了更多的错误侵入),以及协作后的协作后回忆收益。本研究引入了 Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) 列表,不仅是为了研究语义相关信息中的这些现象,而且还设置了探索协作环境中错误记忆的课程。另一个问题是这些影响对不同情景记忆测试(即项目记忆和源记忆测试)的敏感性。鉴于这些,当前的研究指导参与者研究几个 DRM 列表,然后回忆以前研究过的单词(项目回忆)及其显示的颜色(来源检索)两次(回忆 1 和 2)。召回 1 是单独或合作进行的,而召回 2 是单独进行的。获得了协作抑制的成本以及三种不同的有益效果:错误修剪、错误记忆减少和协作后回忆收益。此外,当前研究的新意义在于它揭示了 DRM 列表中协作抑制和错误修剪对测试条件的敏感性,并证明了协作对错误记忆的调节在协作期间和之后以相同的方式发生。
更新日期:2019-12-01
down
wechat
bug