当前位置: X-MOL 学术TAXON › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
(034–035) Proposals to amend Article 9.6 and Example 6
TAXON ( IF 3.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-31 , DOI: 10.1002/tax.12380
Avishek Bhattacharjee 1 , Monalisa Dey 1 , Subir Bandyopadhyay 2
Affiliation  

Article 9.6 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018) reads as follows: “A syntype is any specimen cited in the protologue when there is no holotype, or any one of two or more specimens simultaneously designated in the protologue as types (see also Art. 40 Note 1). Reference to an entire gathering, or a part thereof, is considered citation of the included specimens.”

We feel that it would be better if a cross‐reference to Art. 40 Note 2, which explains what does and does not constitute “mention of a single specimen or gathering”, were included in the definition of syntype, after “Reference to an entire gathering, or a part thereof”, to make clearer the distinction between syntypes and uncited original material (see also Prop. 010 – Prado & al. in Taxon 69: 629. 2020).



中文翻译:

(034–035)修改第9.6条和示例6的提案

深圳法》第9.6(Turland等人,在Regnum Veg。159. 2018中)的内容如下:“同型是指没有原型时在原型中引用的任何标本,或同时标明的两个或多个标本中的任何一个原型作为类型(另见第40条注1)。提及整个集会或其中的一部分被认为是对所含标本的引用。”

我们认为,如果对艺术进行交叉引用会更好。40注2,在“参考整个采集或其一部分”之后,解释了同种型的定义中包括和不构成“单个标本或采集的提法”的内容,以更清楚地区分原型和未引用的原始材料(另请参见Prop。010 – Prado等人,在Taxon 69:629。2020中)。

更新日期:2021-01-01
down
wechat
bug