The way humans interact within buildings strongly affect building energy consumptions and environmental impacts. In addition, the building and its environment influence the human way of life. Human-building interactions are thus of interest in both engineering domains and social sciences. However, building engineering and social sciences are rarely suited by each other. In this article, a multidisciplinary post-occupancy evaluation of a new fully inhabited rental multifamily house is undertaken. A key feature is the contribution of a sociologist and engineers on the performance assessment of one building. Each actor performed separately: i) an immersive and co-reflexive sociological study, based on in-situ discussions, with inhabitants; ii) a study of energy consumptions and indoor environment through onsite measurements; iii) a life cycle assessment. Then, for the first time a sociologist and engineers cross-analysed their results and identified five convergence points studied from different perspectives in each discipline. They are related to people, health, outdoor conditions, use of systems and norms. The disciplinary and combined results are useful to improve the design of future buildings and the conditions of existing buildings. This article offers a baseline for a broader interdisciplinary analysis of building performances by issuing recommendations for future studies.

人类在建筑物内的互动方式会严重影响建筑物的能源消耗和环境影响。此外，建筑物及其环境也会影响人类的生活方式。因此，人与建筑之间的相互作用在工程领域和社会科学领域都受到关注。但是，建筑工程学和社会科学很少相互适应。在本文中，对一个新的完全有人居住的出租多户住宅进行了多学科的居住后评估。一个关键特征是社会学家和工程师对一栋建筑物的性能评估的贡献。每个演员分别表演：i）基于与居民的现场讨论进行的沉浸式和反身性社会学研究；ii）通过现场测量研究能耗和室内环境；iii）生命周期评估。然后，这是社会学家和工程师第一次对他们的结果进行交叉分析，并确定了从各个学科的不同角度研究的五个收敛点。它们与人，健康，室外条件，系统和规范的使用有关。学科和综合结果对于改进未来建筑物的设计和现有建筑物的条件很有用。本文通过发布未来研究的建议，为建筑性能的更广泛的跨学科分析提供了基准。学科和综合结果对于改进未来建筑物的设计和现有建筑物的条件很有用。本文通过发布未来研究的建议，为建筑性能的更广泛的跨学科分析提供了基准。学科和综合结果对于改进未来建筑物的设计和现有建筑物的条件很有用。本文通过发布未来研究的建议，为建筑性能的更广泛的跨学科分析提供了基准。