I'll show that the kind of analogy between life and information [argue for by authors such as Davies (2000), Walker and Davies (2013), Dyson (1979), Gleick (2011), Kurzweil (2012), Ward (2009)], that seems to be central to the effect that artificial mind may represents an expected advance in the life evolution in Universe, is like the design argument and that if the design argument is unfounded and invalid, the argument to the effect that artificial mind may represents an expected advance in the life evolution in Universe is also unfounded and invalid. However, if we are prepared to admit (though we should not do) this method of reasoning as valid, I'll show that the analogy between life and information to the effect that artificial mind may represents an expected advance in the life evolution in Universe seems suggest some type of reductionism of life to information, but biology respectively chemistry or physics are not reductionist, contrary to what seems to be suggested by the analogy between life and information.

中文翻译：

---

类比，思维与生活

我将展示生命和信息之间的类比[作者争辩的人，例如Davies（2000），Walker和Davies（2013），Dyson（1979），Gleick（2011），Kurzweil（2012），Ward（2009） ）]，这似乎是人工思维可能代表宇宙生命进化的预期进展的核心，就像设计论点一样，如果设计论点没有根据且无效，那么关于人工思维效果的论点可能代表了宇宙生命发展中的预期进步，这也是没有根据的和无效的。但是，如果我们准备承认（尽管我们不应该这样做）这种推理方法有效，那么我