当前位置: X-MOL 学术Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Understanding racism in physical (biological) anthropology
American Journal of Physical Anthropology ( IF 2.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-28 , DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.24208
Michael L Blakey 1
Affiliation  

The mainstream of American physical anthropology began as racist and eugenical science that defended slavery, restricted “non-Nordic” immigration, and justified Jim Crow segregation. After World War II, the field became more anti-racial than anti-racist. It has continued as a study of natural influences on human variation and thus continues to evade the social histories of inequitable biological variation. Also reflecting its occupancy of white space, biological anthropology continues to deny its own racist history and marginalizes the contributions of Blacks. Critical disciplinary history and a shift toward biocultural studies might begin an anti-racist human biology.

中文翻译:

了解身体(生物)人类学中的种族主义

美国身体人类学的主流始于种族主义和优生科学,捍卫奴隶制,限制“非北欧”移民并为吉姆·克劳(Jim Crow)种族隔离辩护。第二次世界大战后,战场变得比反种族主义更加反种族。作为对人类变异的自然影响的研究,它一直在继续,因此继续逃避不公平的生物变异的社会历史。生物人类学也反映了它对空白的占有,继续否认自己的种族主义历史,并将黑人的贡献边缘化。关键的学科历史和向生物文化研究的转变可能会开始反种族主义的人类生物学。
更新日期:2020-12-28
down
wechat
bug