ABSTRACT

Various guidelines for the social implementation of autonomous robots have been developed so far; however, how these guidelines are used remains an issue. In this study, the concept of legitimacy is used as a criterion to evaluate such guidelines. From the perspective of legitimacy, sociological acceptance, moral legitimacy, and future expectations can be considered constitutional and legal perspectives when addressing the necessary conditions for the social implementation of autonomous robots. At the same time, the article considers that resources, reflections, expertise, recognitions, and results are required as sufficient conditions of the elaboration likelihood model. As a case study, an examination of the Japanese government’s approach to ethics extracted the need for moral legitimacy and the need for resources and advice from a professional perspective on ethics to obtain adequate outcomes. It has contributed to this paper by presenting a review process, in which the necessary and sufficient conditions for consideration must be examined from the perspective of legitimacy.

摘要

到目前为止，已经开发了各种用于自动执行机器人的社会准则。但是，如何使用这些准则仍然是一个问题。在本研究中，合法性的概念用作评估此类指南的标准。从合法性的角度来看，在解决自主机器人在社会上实现的必要条件时，可以从宪法和法律的角度考虑社会学上的接受，道德合法性和未来的期望。同时，本文认为需要资源，反思，专业知识，认可和结果，作为阐述似然模型的充分条件。作为案例研究 对日本政府道德规范方法的研究从道德的专业角度提取了道德合法性的需要以及对资源和建议的需求，以获取适当的结果。它通过提出一个审查过程为本文做出了贡献，在审查过程中，必须从合法性的角度审查必要的充分条件。