Abstract:Pierre Bourdieu's account of the modern state's emergence has affinities with the analyses of legal systems offered by Herbert Hart and Hans Kelsen. Bourdieu, Hart, and Kelsen each describe normative spaces within which practical life unfolds. While Bourdieu's account of the state as 'a space of spaces' is less systematic than the analyses of Hart and Kelsen, he augments their contributions in important ways. He conveys a more definite sense of the texture of lived experience within the space he describes than either Hart or Kelsen on the modern state. Bourdieu's analysis also affords a basis on which to draw out the significance of institutions that rarely feature in jurisprudential works on the state or legal systems. This article illustrates this point by reference to the public inquiry. It also finds at work within On the State an ideal that gives expression to an egalitarian philosophy of government. This is the ideal of politeia, which, on the view offered here, identifies legal, political, and economic institutions and practices as constituents of 'community.'

中文翻译：

---

Politeia 在我们实际生活中的地位：皮埃尔·布迪厄谈现代国家

摘要：皮埃尔·布迪厄 (Pierre Bourdieu) 对现代国家出现的描述与赫伯特·哈特 (Herbert Hart) 和汉斯·凯尔森 (Hans Kelsen) 对法律制度的分析有相似之处。布迪厄、哈特和凯尔森各自描述了实践生活展开的规范空间。尽管布迪厄将国家描述为“空间空间”的描述不如哈特和凯尔森的分析系统，但他以重要的方式增强了他们的贡献。与现代国家的哈特或凯尔森相比，他在他所描述的空间内传达了更明确的生活体验质感。布迪厄的分析还提供了一个基础，可以在此基础上得出很少出现在关于国家或法律体系的法理学著作中的制度的重要性。这篇文章通过参考公众调查来说明这一点。它还在 On the State 中发现了一种理想，它表达了政府的平等主义哲学。这是 politeia 的理想，根据这里提供的观点，它将法律、政治和经济制度和实践确定为“社区”的组成部分。