当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Supreme Court Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Byrd v United States: Unauthorized Drivers of Rental Cars Have Fourth Amendment Rights? Not as Evident as It Seems
The Supreme Court Review ( IF 1.333 ) Pub Date : 2019-05-01 , DOI: 10.1086/702282
Tracey Maclin

No discerning student of the Supreme Court would contend that Justice Anthony Kennedy broadly interpreted the Fourth Amendment during his thirty years on theCourt. For example, inMaryland v King, a 2013 case that Justice Samuel Alito described as “perhaps the most important criminal case that this Court has heard in decades,” Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion rejected a Fourth Amendment challenge to a Maryland law requiring forensic testing of DNA samples taken frompersons arrested for violent crimes.Kingwas criticized by individuals and organizations across the political spectrum, and it

中文翻译:

伯德诉美国案:未经授权的租车司机拥有第四修正案的权利?不像看起来那么明显

最高法院的任何有眼光的学生都不会争辩说安东尼肯尼迪大法官在他在法院的三十年中对第四修正案进行了广泛的解释。例如,在 2013 年的马里兰诉金案中,大法官塞缪尔·阿利托 (Samuel Alito) 将其描述为“可能是本法院几十年来审理过的最重要的刑事案件”,肯尼迪大法官的多数意见驳回了对马里兰州法律要求对 DNA 进行法医检测的第四修正案的挑战。从因暴力犯罪被捕的人身上采集的样本。 金受到了整个政治领域的个人和组织的批评,并且
更新日期:2019-05-01
down
wechat
bug