In Carpenter v United States, the Supreme Court struggled to modernize twentieth-century search and seizure precedents for the “Cyber Age.” Twice previously this decade the Court had tweaked Fourth Amendment doctrine to keep pace with advancing technology, requiring a search warrant before the government can either peruse the contents of a cell phone seized incident to arrest or use a GPS tracker to follow a car’s long-term movements. This time, the

中文翻译：

---

位置跟踪和数字数据：Carpenter 能否建立稳定的隐私原则？

在 Carpenter v United States 案中，最高法院努力使 20 世纪“网络时代”的搜查和扣押先例现代化。本十年之前，法院曾两次调整第四修正案的原则以跟上先进的技术步伐，要求在政府可以仔细阅读被扣押的手机内容以进行逮捕或使用 GPS 跟踪器长期跟踪汽车之前需要搜查令运动。这一次，