Masterpiece Cakeshop v Colorado Human Rights Commission has been discussed in fairly specific terms—the collision of liberty and equality; or, more particularly, religious freedom versus antidiscrimination norms. This frame is certainly accurate, though hardly exhaustive. There are a number of lenses through which we might understand this case. And, indeed, different lenses may cast the Court’s decision in entirely new lights, bringing the decision into conversations that may, at first blush, seem quite distant from the questions presented to the Supreme Court. With this in mind, in this essay I reframeMasterpiece Cakeshop to go beyond thecollisionof religious liberty andequality to intervene in these other conversations. As I explain, Masterpiece Cakeshop gestures toward interesting, though neglected, developments in antidiscrimination law. As claims for religious accommodation have proliferated, those seeking

中文翻译：

---

反转 Animus：杰作蛋糕店和新少数民族

Masterpiece Cakeshop v Colorado Human Rights Commission 已经用相当具体的术语进行了讨论——自由与平等的碰撞；或者，更具体地说，宗教自由与反歧视规范。这个框架当然是准确的，虽然几乎没有穷尽。有许多镜头可以让我们理解这种情况。而且，事实上，不同的镜头可能会以全新的眼光看待法院的裁决，将裁决带入对话中，乍一看，这些对话可能与提交给最高法院的问题相去甚远。考虑到这一点，在这篇文章中，我重新定义了 Masterpiece Cakeshop，以超越宗教自由和平等的冲突来干预这些其他对话。正如我所解释的，Masterpiece Cakeshop 指向了反歧视法中有趣但被忽视的发展。