The Court of Appeal delivered its eagerly awaited judgment in the appeal filed against Birss J's judgment in the Unwired Planet v Huawei case on 23 October 2018. Birss J's judgment included an analysis of some of the most controversial issues related to standard essential patents (SEPs) and particularly the fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) concept. The Court of Appeal reviewed these issues and handed down a judgment (together with Birss J's judgment) that has the potential to become a legal foundation for SEP-related disputes in England. It is highly likely that these judgments will also provide a guidance to courts in other jurisdictions and shape the practice in this highly dynamic and developing area. The judgments also represent the English courts’ unbiased view towards SEP owners.

中文翻译：

---

Unwired Planet v华为– FRAND是否具有吸引力？

上诉法院在2018年10月23日针对Birss J在Unwired Planet v Huawei案中的判决中提起的上诉中，迫切期待的判决。BirrsJ的判决包括对与标准必要专利（SEP）相关的一些最具争议性问题的分析。尤其是公平，合理和非歧视（FRAND）的概念。上诉法院对这些问题进行了审查，并下达了一项判决（连同Birss J的判决），该判决有可能成为英格兰与SEP有关的纠纷的法律基础。这些判决很可能还会为其他司法管辖区的法院提供指导，并在这个高度动态和发展的领域中塑造实践。判决也代表了英国法院对SEP所有者的公正看法。