Abstract Recent articles by prominent scholars of discourse and interaction have renewed the debate over the relationship between membership categorization analysis (MCA) and conversation analysis (CA). Many consider CA and MCA as mutually informing, and that is the position I take in this paper. MCA has been conducted mainly with monolingual data, but in this study I examine Hawaiian language media talk by multilingual speakers. Place formulation is often intertwined with membership categorization, and I investigate how place is used to categorize people. Taking an MCA approach, I analyze the stories co-constructed by a radio show’s host, guest, and callers, all of whom speak predominantly in Hawaiian but occasionally switch into English. The goals of the paper are twofold: (1) to illustrate the procedural consequentiality of initiating, maintaining, and terminating an “ultra-rich topic” (Sacks 1992: 75), that is, place; and (2) to show how place is used to do categorial work.

中文翻译：

---

夏威夷语广播节目中的地点和会员分类

摘要 著名的话语和互动学者最近发表的文章重新引发了关于成员分类分析 (MCA) 和对话分析 (CA) 之间关系的争论。许多人认为 CA 和 MCA 是相互通知的，这就是我在本文中的立场。MCA 主要是使用单语数据进行的，但在这项研究中，我检查了多语种人士对夏威夷语言的媒体谈话。地方表述通常与成员分类交织在一起，我研究了如何使用地方对人进行分类。我采用 MCA 方法，分析由广播节目的主持人、嘉宾和来电者共同构建的故事，他们都主要说夏威夷语，但偶尔会转换成英语。本文的目标是双重的：(1) 说明启动的程序后果，维持和终止一个“超级丰富的话题”（Sacks 1992: 75），即地点；(2) 展示如何使用地方来做分类工作。