The purpose of this paper is threefold. It is aimed at identifying: a broad set of entrepreneurial activities; different university entrepreneurial models; and the entrepreneurial best practices of advanced European ST a “formal” model, which focusses on the financial advantage of universities and their faculties; and a “comprehensive” model, which focusses on the local economic development and the financial advantage of universities and their faculties.,The first limitation of the present paper concerns the limited number of sampled universities. Moreover, this paper is limited to the European area. Future research could enlarge this study by increasing the number of universities and by focusing on other geographical areas. Furthermore, the paper does not assess the effectiveness of the identified entrepreneurial models in supporting entrepreneurship and local economic development. Further research could extend the present analysis and fill these gaps.,The paper contributes to the extant literature under many respects. First, it relies on original primary data. Moreover, it extends previous literature by encompassing the conventional distinction between formal and informal entrepreneurial activities. It also contributes to the emerging literature on entrepreneurial university models and the strategic approaches by identifying the different models of entrepreneurial universities in the European setting of S&T universities focusing on the role played by organisational and regional factors in affecting the adoption of a specific model by universities.

中文翻译：

---

欧洲先进科技大学的创业活动和模式

本文的目的是三方面的。它旨在确定：广泛的创业活动；不同的大学创业模式；欧洲先进的ST的企业最佳实践是“正式”模型，该模型侧重于大学及其教职员工的财务优势；而“综合”模型则侧重于当地的经济发展以及大学及其教职员工的财务优势。本文的第一个局限性在于样本大学的数量有限。此外，本文仅限于欧洲地区。未来的研究可以通过增加大学数量并关注其他地理区域来扩大研究范围。此外，本文没有评估已确定的企业家模式在支持企业家精神和当地经济发展方面的有效性。进一步的研究可以扩展目前的分析并填补这些空白。本文在许多方面为现有文献做出了贡献。首先，它依赖原始原始数据。此外，它涵盖了正式和非正式企业家活动之间的常规区别，从而扩展了以前的文献。它还通过确定欧洲科技大学中的企业家大学的不同模型，着重于组织和区域因素在影响大学采用特定模型方面的作用，从而为有关企业家大学模型和战略方法的新兴文献做出了贡献。 。