Abstract Being agglutinative or flexive are not properties of entire languages, nor are they simple properties. There is a whole ränge of simple properties, all logically independent ofeach other, prominently including those ofseparation/ cumulation and invariance/variance. They are all properties ofindividual wordforms, and again there is no logical necessityfor these to agree in their property sets. This creates a huge potential for heterogeneity within andfor diversity across languages, which, if realized to the fall, would render morphological typology unviable. However, an examination ofsplits between Separation and cumulation and between invariance and variance along the lines ofword-classes, ofsubsets within single word-classes, of morphological categories, and ofterms ofcategories suggests that mixtures between agglutination and flexion, though multifarious, are not random. Ifgrammars arefound to be less heterogeneous, and languages less diverse, than they could be, this can be due to universal, timeless principles or to regularities ofchange. Both play a wie in shaping morphological Systems.

中文翻译：

---

分裂形态：凝集和屈曲如何混合

摘要凝聚性或屈曲性不是整个语言的特性，也不是简单的特性。有一整套简单属性，所有这些属性在逻辑上都彼此独立，主要包括分离/累积和不变性/差异性。它们都是个别字形的属性，再次没有逻辑上的必要使它们在其属性集中达成一致。这为语言之间的多样性和多样性提供了巨大的潜力，如果在秋天实现，将使形态学类型不可行。但是，对沿单词类，单个单词类内的子集，形态学类别和类别术语的分离和累积以及不变性和方差之间的分离进行的研究表明，凝集和弯曲之间的混合，尽管种类繁多，但并非随机。如果发现语法的异质性不强，语言的多样性不如可能，这可能是由于普遍的，永恒的原则或变化规律所致。两者都在塑造形态系统方面发挥了作用。