Popular contingency approaches to organisational change management imply that it is known what and when practices are most appropriate and effective to manage change. The current work aims to question this assumption.,The current work critically reviews the quality of current evidence supporting organisational change management and considers the role of open science practices for the field.,First, evidence informing organisational change management is poor, heavily reliant upon unquestioned theoretical models and low-quality cross-sectional or case-study designs. Greater adoption of an evidence-based approach to practice could facilitate organisational change management, but only once a higher quality of evidence is available to inform more robust practical guidance. Second, open science practices look well placed to drive a higher quality of evidence suitable for informing future change management.,The current work highlights the problematic nature of the quality and application of current evidence to inform organisational change and raises a number of recommendations to support future evidence development using an open science approach.

中文翻译：

---

通过开放科学提高组织变更管理的证据质量

流行的针对组织变更管理的权变方法意味着人们知道什么以及什么时候最合适和有效地管理变更。当前的工作旨在质疑这一假设。当前的工作严格地审查了支持组织变革管理的现有证据的质量，并考虑了开放科学实践对该领域的作用。首先，通知组织变革管理的证据较差，严重依赖于组织变革管理毫无疑问的理论模型和低质量的横截面或案例研究设计。更大程度地采用基于证据的实践方法可以促进组织变更管理，但是只有在可以使用更高质量的证据来提供更可靠的实践指导时才可以。第二，