当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Managerial Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A theory of branched situational judgment tests and their applicant reactions
Journal of Managerial Psychology ( IF 4.043 ) Pub Date : 2020-03-03 , DOI: 10.1108/jmp-10-2018-0434
Craig M. Reddock , Elena M. Auer , Richard N. Landers

Branched situational judgment tests (BSJTs) are an increasingly common employee selection method, yet there is no theory and very little empirical work explaining the designs and impacts of branching. To encourage additional research on BSJTs, and to provide practitioners with a common language to describe their current and future practices, we sought to develop a theory of BSTJs.,Given the absence of theory on branching, we utilized a ground theory qualitative research design, conducting interviews with 25 BSJT practitioner subject matter experts.,Our final theory consists of three components: (1) a taxonomy of BSJT branching features (contingency, parallelism, convergence, and looping) and options within those features (which vary), (2) a causal theoretical model describing impacts of branching in general on applicant reactions via proximal effects on face validity, and (3) a causal theoretical model describing impacts on applicant reactions among branching designs via proximal effects on consistency of administration and opportunity to perform.,Our work provides the first theoretical foundation on which future confirmatory research in the BSJT domain can be built. It also gives both researchers and practitioners a common language for describing branching features and their options. Finally, it reveals BSJTs as the results of a complex set of interrelated design features, discouraging the oversimplified contrasting of “branching” vs “not branching.”

中文翻译:

分支情境判断测验及其申请人反应的理论

分支机构情境判断测试(BSJT)是一种越来越普遍的员工选择方法,但是没有理论和经验工作可以解释分支机构的设计和影响。为了鼓励对BSJT进行更多的研究,并为从业人员提供一种通用的语言来描述其当前和未来的实践,我们试图开发一种BSTJ的理论。鉴于缺乏分支理论,我们采用了基础理论定性研究设计,我们接受了25位BSJT从业者主题专家的采访。我们的最终理论包括三个组成部分:(1)BSJT分支特征(偶然性,并行性,收敛性和循环性)的分类法以及这些特征内的选项(有所不同),(2)一个因果关系理论模型,该因果关系模型描述了总体上通过对脸部有效性的近端影响对申请人反应的影响;以及(3)一个因果关系理论模型,通过对管理一致性和执行机会的近端影响,描述了分支机构设计对申请人反应的影响我们的工作提供了第一个理论基础,可以在此基础上建立BSJT领域的未来验证性研究。它还为研究人员和从业人员提供了描述分支功能及其选择的通用语言。最后,它揭示了BSJT是一组复杂的相互关联的设计功能的结果,不鼓励过度简化“分支”与“不分支”的对比。(3)一个因果关系理论模型,通过对管理一致性和执行机会的近距离影响来描述分支设计之间申请人反应的影响。我们的工作提供了第一个理论基础,可以在此基础上建立BSJT领域的未来验证性研究。它还为研究人员和从业人员提供了描述分支功能及其选择的通用语言。最后,它揭示了BSJT是一组复杂的相互关联的设计功能的结果,不鼓励过度简化“分支”与“不分支”的对比。(3)一个因果关系理论模型,通过对管理一致性和执行机会的近距离影响来描述分支设计之间申请人反应的影响。我们的工作提供了第一个理论基础,可以在此基础上建立BSJT领域的未来验证性研究。它还为研究人员和从业人员提供了描述分支功能及其选择的通用语言。最后,它揭示了BSJT是一组复杂的相互关联的设计功能的结果,不鼓励过度简化“分支”与“不分支”的对比。它还为研究人员和从业人员提供了描述分支功能及其选择的通用语言。最后,它揭示了BSJT是一组复杂的相互关联的设计功能的结果,不鼓励过度简化“分支”与“不分支”的对比。它还为研究人员和从业人员提供了描述分支功能及其选择的通用语言。最后,它揭示了BSJT是一组复杂的相互关联的设计功能的结果,不鼓励过度简化“分支”与“不分支”的对比。
更新日期:2020-03-03
down
wechat
bug