Abstract Since the 1980s, debates on security have expanded and security has become a catchphrase in virtually every area of life. In Finland, the government elected in 2003 began its four-year period in power by launching a special Internal Security Programme (ISP) that stressed the threat of social exclusion. Altogether four ISPs have been launched in Finland since 2004 . They all repeat the menace of social exclusion. In this article, we examine how these speech acts materialised on the level of legislation. Our study suggests that in Finland, the securitization of exclusion was only accepted in the media. Overall it ‘failed’, as on the level of law, internal security and exclusion were not, in the main, connected when security measures were justified. On the other hand, we contend that by introducing more monitoring and less privacy – especially among youth – the legislation effectively opened novel avenues for ‘security nothings’.

中文翻译：

---

超越非凡

摘要 自 80 年代以来，关于安全的争论不断扩大，安全几乎已成为生活各个领域的标语。In Finland, the government elected in 2003 began its four-year period in power by launching a special Internal Security Programme (ISP) that stressed the threat of social exclusion. 自 2004 年以来，芬兰总共启动了四个 ISP。他们都在重复社会排斥的威胁。在本文中，我们研究了这些言论行为如何在立法层面上具体化。我们的研究表明，在芬兰，排斥的证券化只被媒体接受。总的来说，它“失败了”，因为在法律层面上，内部安全和排斥在安全措施合理的情况下基本上没有联系。另一方面，