material at atypically fast rates. Moreover, they were identified at a different age, during a different decade, and using different procedures. If such a sample of young adults were assessed 25 years after their initial identification using the same age-50 outcome measures employed in Study 1, a compelling test of the generalizability and robustness of the findings in Study 1 would be possible. Would the psychological well-being of these participants covary with the amount of educational acceleration they experienced prior to high school graduation?

中文翻译：

---

天才青年的学业加速和对心理健康的徒劳担忧：一项为期 35 年的纵向研究。

材料以非常快的速度。此外，他们是在不同的年龄、不同的十年和使用不同的程序被识别出来的。如果使用与研究 1 中相同的 50 岁结果测量方法在初次鉴定后 25 年对此类年轻人样本进行评估，则可能对研究 1 中发现的普遍性和稳健性进行令人信服的测试。这些参与者的心理健康是否会随着他们在高中毕业前所经历的教育加速量而变化？