当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Diversity in Higher Education › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Absent Autonomy: Relational Competence and Gendered Paths to Faculty Self-Determination in the Promotion and Tenure Process.
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education ( IF 4.762 ) Pub Date : 2018-09-01 , DOI: 10.1037/dhe0000064
Monica C. Skewes , Elizabeth A. Shanahan , Jessi L. Smith , Joy C. Honea , Rebecca Belou , Sara Rushing , Kristen Intemann , Ian M. Handley

This research examines ways in which men and women university faculty sought self-determination in the promotion and tenure (P&T) process. Self-Determination Theory (SDT; Deci & Ryan, 2012) research tends to view autonomy as the central factor in self-determination, taking priority over other psychological needs of relatedness and competence. The P&T process occurs within a context that inherently limits autonomy, providing a unique opportunity to examine experiences of relatedness and competence when autonomy is constrained. We used a qualitative research strategy with a matched case study design to explore how individuals experience the constructs of SDT (i.e., autonomy, competence, and relatedness) within the P&T process. Our project focuses on faculty in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) departments undergoing P&T review at one university. Women faculty in STEM were compared with men faculty at the same rank and in similar departments concurrently going through P&T review. Findings showed that men reported experiencing self-determination via informational competence whereas women approached self-determination through relational competence. Creating a level playing field for faculty navigating the P&T process requires being attuned to different paths to self-determination, fostering relationships between faculty, and clarifying policies and procedures.

中文翻译:

缺席自治:在晋升和任期过程中教师自决的关系能力和性别路径。

这项研究调查了男性和女性大学教师在晋升和任期 (P&T) 过程中寻求自决权的方式。自决理论 (SDT; Deci & Ryan, 2012) 研究倾向于将自主性视为自决的核心因素,优先于相关性和能力等其他心理需求。P&T 过程发生在固有限制自主权的背景下,提供了一个独特的机会,当自主权受到限制时,可以检查相关性和能力的经验。我们使用具有匹配案例研究设计的定性研究策略来探索个人如何在 P&T 过程中体验 SDT 的结构(即自主性、能力和相关性)。我们的项目侧重于科学、技术、工程、和数学 (STEM) 系在一所大学接受 P&T 审查。STEM 中的女教师与同时接受 P&T 审查的相同级别和类似部门的男教师进行了比较。研究结果表明,男性报告通过信息能力体验自决,而女性通过关系能力实现自决。为教师在 P&T 过程中导航创造一个公平的竞争环境需要适应不同的自我决定途径,培养教师之间的关系,并澄清政策和程序。研究结果表明,男性报告通过信息能力体验自决,而女性通过关系能力实现自决。为教师在 P&T 过程中导航创造一个公平的竞争环境需要适应不同的自我决定途径,培养教师之间的关系,并澄清政策和程序。研究结果表明,男性报告通过信息能力体验自决,而女性通过关系能力实现自决。为教师在 P&T 过程中导航创造一个公平的竞争环境需要适应不同的自我决定途径,培养教师之间的关系,并澄清政策和程序。
更新日期:2018-09-01
down
wechat
bug