Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Share determination of stakeholder delays, based on targeted delay analysis of projects, with incursive and defensive (In-De) approach
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business ( IF 2.951 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-01 , DOI: 10.1108/ijmpb-08-2019-0196
Vahid Rooholelm , Abbas Sheikh Aboumasoudi

Almost all projects in the world are delayed, and sometimes even lead to the full bankruptcy of their beneficiaries. These delays can be calculated using techniques, but most importantly, there must be a fair and realistic division of delays between project beneficiaries. The most valid delay calculation techniques belong to the SCL Global Protocol, but they also have significant drawbacks, such as these: (1) They do not have the capability to prevent project delays (Delay Risk Management); (2) The protocol identifies and introduces any delays in activities with a ratio of one to one as a delay (Effective Delay); (3) It also does not offer the capability to share delays between stakeholders, which is a huge weakness. Floating in the base schedule activities is one of the cost control tools of projects, but it can hide project delays. In this paper, the researchers believe that the floating ownership belongs to the project and not belong to the stakeholders. This is the main tool for analyzing and sharing delays in this research.,The research methodology adopted included an extensive literature review, expert interviews, use of questionnaire and designing three innovative linked together models by researchers.,In this research, an integrated technique is introduced which has the following capabilities; delay risk control, result-based delay analysis and stakeholders delay sharing. This technique with an incursive and defensive approach implements claims management principles and calculates, respectively, non-attributable and attributable delays for each beneficiary.,This creativity led to the introduction of the Incursive and Defensive (In-De) technique; in the SCL protocol techniques, none of these capabilities exist.

中文翻译:

利益相关者延迟的份额确定,基于项目的延迟分析,采用侵入性和防御性(In-De)方法

世界上几乎所有项目都被推迟,有时甚至导致受益人完全破产。可以使用技术来计算这些延迟,但是最重要的是,项目受益人之间必须对延迟进行公平,现实的划分。最有效的延迟计算技术属于SCL全局协议,但它们也具有明显的缺点,例如:(1)它们没有防止项目延迟的能力(延迟风险管理);(2)协议确定并引入活动中的任何延误,将延误比例为一比一(有效延误);(3)它也没有提供在利益相关者之间共享延迟的功能,这是一个巨大的弱点。浮动在基本计划活动中是项目的成本控制工具之一,但它可以隐藏项目的延迟。在本文中,研究人员认为,浮动所有权属于项目,而不属于利益相关者。这是分析和共享研究延误的主要工具。采用的研究方法包括广泛的文献综述,专家访谈,问卷的使用以及研究人员设计的三个创新的链接在一起的模型。介绍具有以下功能;延迟风险控制,基于结果的延迟分析和利益相关者延迟共享。这种采用侵入性和防御性方法的技术实现了索赔管理原则,并分别计算了每个受益人的非归属性和归属性延迟。这种创造力导致引入了侵入性和防御性(In-De)技术;在SCL协议技术中,
更新日期:2020-07-01
down
wechat
bug