Abstract This article evaluates the use of reflective practice (RP) tools by focusing on the main critiques on RP. In the literature, RP has often been criticised for its design-related problems, RP’s being directed by problem identification purposes rather than empirical data, and RP practitioners’ loss of contact with their discourse communities due to the undue emphasis on practical knowledge. Therefore, this article suggests methodological and data triangulation of RP tools as well as highlighting the community of inquiry framework to overcome the aforementioned problems While doing this, the authors reflect on their own RPs, both of which were conducted at a refugee centre in Philadelphia, USA. In this examination, the critical role of reflective tools is highlighted.

中文翻译：

---

ESL中的反思性实践工具：两项回顾性评估

摘要本文通过关注对RP的主要批评，评估了反思性实践（RP）工具的使用。在文献中，RP经常因其与设计相关的问题而受到批评，RP是以问题识别的目的而非经验数据为指导的，并且RP从业人员由于对实践知识的过分强调而失去了与话语社区的联系。因此，本文提出了RP工具的方法和数据三角剖分方法，并着重强调了克服上述问题的查询框架。在此过程中，作者对自己的RP进行了反思，二者都是在费城的一个难民中心进行的，美国。在这项检查中，突出了反射工具的关键作用。