当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Environ. Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Samuel Smith and Judicial Review of Policy Interpretation: A Middle Way in the Law and Policy Divide
Journal of Environmental Law ( IF 1.750 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-09 , DOI: 10.1093/jel/eqaa011
Samuel Ruiz-Tagle

This analysis explores new developments in judicial review of planning policy interpretation. It shows how the nature of policy, often contextual and judgment-dependent, has led the UK Supreme Court to rethink the standard of review applicable to this issue. By considering the recent decision in Samuel Smith as part of a trilogy of cases—including Tesco Stores and Hopkins Homes—this analysis reveals a change in judicial attitudes, away from the expansive judicial supervision upheld in Tesco Stores. Furthermore, this study reflects on how this change is related to two wider ideas. The first is the Court’s understanding of the law and policy divide in the planning field, whilst the second is to do with a pragmatic stance regarding the purpose of the planning system and the institutional role of the courts in it. Finally, this analysis shows how the new approach emphasises the distinctive character of policy in the planning context.

中文翻译:

塞缪尔·史密斯Samuel Smith)和《政策解释的司法审查:法律和政策鸿沟的中间途径》

该分析探索了对计划政策解释的司法审查的新进展。它显示了政策的本质(通常取决于上下文和依赖于判决)如何导致英国最高法院重新考虑适用于此问题的审查标准。通过将塞缪尔·史密斯Samuel Smith)最近的判决作为案件三部曲的一部分(包括特易购(Tesco)商店霍普金斯之家)的分析,该分析揭示了司法态度的变化,而不是在特易购(Tesco)商店中维持广泛的司法监督。此外,本研究反映了这种变化与两个更广泛的想法之间的关系。第一个是法院对计划领域法律和政策分歧的理解,第二个是关于计划系统的目的和法院在其中的制度性作用的务实态度。最后,这一分析表明了新方法如何在规划环境中强调政策的独特性。
更新日期:2020-10-09
down
wechat
bug