当前位置: X-MOL 学术Soc. Just. Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Lay Victims’ Conceptions of Environmental Crime and Environmental Injustice: The Case of the Chem-Dyne Superfund Site
Social Justice Research ( IF 1.700 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-14 , DOI: 10.1007/s11211-020-00359-4
Emmanuel A. Ogundipe , Ryan Gunderson

This project explores lay victims’ conceptions of environmental crime and environmental injustice through in-depth interviews with a snowball sample of people affected by, and former employees of, the Chem-Dyne Superfund site in Hamilton, Ohio, USA. Qualitative content analysis revealed that participants used the following criteria to define both environmental crime and environmental injustice: illegality, intentionality, harm and safety, and unfairness. These findings have important implications for studies of environmental crime and environmental injustice: (1) Lay victims’ conceptions of environmental crime and environmental injustice are multidimensional concepts; (2) lay victims’ conceptions of environmental crime and environmental injustice are mostly anthropocentric; (3) there is significant conceptual overlap between environmental crime and environmental injustice in lay victim accounts; and (4) lay victims’ conceptions of environmental crime and environmental injustice are similar to, yet distinct from, formal and academic definitions.

中文翻译:

受害者的环境犯罪和环境不公正观念:以Chem-Dyne超级基金网站为例

该项目通过对受美国俄亥俄州汉密尔顿的Chem-Dyne Superfund网站及其前雇员影响的人的滚雪球样本进行深入采访,探索了外行受害者对环境犯罪和环境不公正的观念。定性的内容分析发现,参与者使用下列标准来定义这两个环境犯罪和环境不公:违法性,意向性,危害和安全,以及不公平。这些发现对环境犯罪和环境不公正的研究具有重要意义:(1)受害者对环境犯罪和环境不公正的看法是多维的概念;(2)非专业受害者对环境犯罪和环境不公的观念大多以人为本。(3)外行受害者账目中的环境犯罪与环境不公正之间在概念上存在重大重叠;(4)外行受害者关于环境犯罪和环境不公正的概念与正式和学术定义相似,但又有区别
更新日期:2020-10-14
down
wechat
bug