Although right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) are the two most studied individual difference correlates of prejudice, debate remains over their status as enduring constructs that precede generalized prejudice. We contribute to this discussion using 10 annual waves of longitudinal data from a nationwide random sample of adults to investigate the stability and temporal precedence of RWA, SDO, and prejudice among members of an ethnic majority group (Ns = 23,383–47,217). Results reveal high wave-to-wave rank-order stability for RWA, SDO, and generalized prejudice. Adjusting for their between-person stability, RWA and SDO predicted within-person increases in generalized prejudice. Results replicated when predicting (a) prejudice toward three specific minority groups (namely, Māori, Pacific Islanders, and Asians) and (b) anti-minority beliefs. These findings demonstrate that RWA and SDO are highly stable over 10 consecutive years and that they independently precede within-person annual increases in generalized prejudice and anti-minority beliefs.

尽管右翼威权主义（RWA）和社会支配取向（SDO）是偏见中两个研究最多的个体差异相关因素，但关于它们作为普遍偏见之前的持久建构的地位仍存在争议。我们使用来自全国范围的成年人随机抽样的10次年度纵波数据为这一讨论做出了贡献，以调查RWA，SDO和偏见在少数族裔群体成员中的稳定性和时间优先权（N s = 23,383–47,217）。结果表明，RWA，SDO和普遍偏见具有很高的波间波动次序稳定性。调整人与人之间的稳定性后，RWA和SDO在人的普遍偏见增加。在预测（a）对三个特定的少数群体（即毛利人，太平洋岛民和亚洲人）的偏见和（b）反少数民族信仰时，结果重复出现。这些发现表明，RWA和SDO已连续10年保持高度稳定，并且在普遍偏见和反少数群体信仰方面，它们在个人年均增长之前独立出现。