This article encourages transparency in the reporting of meta-analytic procedures. Specifically, we highlight aspects of meta-analytic search, coding, data presentation, and data analysis where published meta-analyses often fall short in presenting sufficient information to allow replication. We identify opportunities where reviewers can request additional information or analyses that will enhance transparent reporting practices and facilitate the evaluation of quality in meta-analytic reporting. We focus on concerns specific to (or prevalent in) meta-analyses conducted in organizational research. In doing so, we reference a number of existing and emerging techniques, highlighting their contribution to meta-analysis while emphasizing key information reviewers may request. Our focus is primarily on meta-analyses, but secondary uses of meta-analytic data are also considered. We conclude by providing a checklist for reviewers in an effort to facilitate the review process as it pertains to the goals of transparency and replicability.

本文鼓励在荟萃分析程序的报告中保持透明。具体来说，我们重点介绍了元分析搜索，编码，数据表示和数据分析的方面，其中已发布的元分析通常在提供足够的信息以进行复制时往往不够用。我们确定了机会，让审阅者可以请求其他信息或分析，这些信息或分析将增强透明的报告做法并促进对元分析报告质量的评估。我们关注组织研究中特定于（或普遍存在）荟萃分析的关注点。在此过程中，我们参考了许多现有技术和新兴技术，着重强调了它们对荟萃分析的贡献，同时着重强调了审阅者可能要求的关键信息。我们的重点主要是荟萃分析，但是也考虑了荟萃分析数据的二次使用。最后，我们为审阅者提供了一份清单，以简化与透明度和可复制性目标有关的审阅过程。