The use of concepts is a vital part of the research process. Many researchers overexploit popular concepts by adding more and more vague and poorly defined meanings to them, thereby making their boundaries unclear and the concepts increasingly unwieldy. We will refer to these types of concepts as hembigs - an acronym for hegemonic, ambiguous, big concepts. The article demonstrates the problem in three domains: leadership, strategy and institution. It suggests ways to mitigate the problems with dominant scientific concepts, overloaded with more or less incoherent meanings.

中文翻译：

---

特快：组织研究中大概念的霸权歧义

概念的使用是研究过程中至关重要的部分。许多研究人员通过为流行的概念添加越来越模糊和定义不清的含义，从而过度利用了流行的概念，从而使它们的界限不清晰，概念也变得越来越笨拙。我们将这些类型的概念称为超大概念-霸权，歧义，大概念的首字母缩写。本文从三个方面展示了该问题：领导力，战略和制度。它提出了减轻占主导地位的科学概念（或多或少含糊不清的含义）的方法。