To date, analyses of gender justice at the International Criminal Court (ICC) have focused primarily on critiques of, and shifts within, the Office of the Prosecutor. This article takes a different approach by focusing on the ICC’s judiciary. We being by arguing that state parties can and should do more than electing a balance of male and female judges – they can also ensure gender-sensitivity on the Bench by supporting candidates with expertise in gender analysis, and by backing judges who bring a feminist approach to their work once elected. Next, we explain the concept of the ‘feminist judgment-writing’ and suggest that this method offers a useful framework for embedding gender-sensitive judging at the ICC. To illustrate this argument, we highlight opportunities for ICC judges to engage in gender-sensitive judging in relation to interpreting the law, making findings of fact, and deciding procedural questions. The final section of the article discusses how best to institutionalize the practice of gender-sensitive judging at the ICC.

中文翻译：

---

国际刑事法院的性别与审判：“女权主义审判项目”的经验教训

迄今为止，国际刑事法院 (ICC) 对性别公正的分析主要集中在对检察官办公室的批评和内部转变上。本文通过关注国际刑事法院的司法机构采取了不同的方法。我们认为，缔约国可以而且应该做的不仅仅是选举男性和女性法官的平衡——他们还可以通过支持具有性别分析专业知识的候选人以及支持采用女权主义方法的法官来确保法官席的性别敏感性to their work once elected. 接下来，我们解释了“女权主义判断写作”的概念，并建议这种方法为在 ICC 嵌入性别敏感判断提供了一个有用的框架。为了说明这个论点，我们强调国际刑事法院法官有机会参与与解释法律、做出事实调查结果和决定程序问题有关的性别敏感判断。本文的最后一部分讨论了如何最好地将国际刑事法院的性别敏感判断实践制度化。