On June 1, 2020, the Supreme Court unanimously held that the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention or Convention) does not conflict with domestic equitable estoppel doctrines that permit the enforcement of arbitration agreements by nonsignatories. The Court interpreted the text of the Convention as being silent on the issue of enforcement by nonsignatories and thus leaving this issue to domestic law. The Court noted that some postratification practice (including the recommendation of a UN commission) and the views of the executive branch were consistent with its conclusion, but it did not determine how much weight should be accorded to these sources.

中文翻译：

---

美国最高法院认为《纽约公约》并未取代允许非签署方执行仲裁协议的国内学说

2020 年 6 月 1 日，最高法院一致认为，《承认和执行外国仲裁裁决公约》（纽约公约或公约）与允许非签署方执行仲裁协议的国内公平不容反悔原则不冲突。法院将公约文本解释为对非签署方的强制执行问题保持沉默，因此将这一问题留给国内法处理。法院指出，一些批准后的做法（包括联合国委员会的建议）和行政部门的观点与其结论一致，但并未确定应给予这些来源多少权重。