当前位置: X-MOL 学术Justice System Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Consensus Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Judging and Judicial Deliberations
Justice System Journal ( IF 0.707 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-17 , DOI: 10.1080/0098261x.2020.1856738
Benjamin Bricker 1
Affiliation  

Abstract

This article seeks to shed new light on how judicial consensus is formed. Through a multi-country series of 17 interviews with judges and clerks in six different courts – both ordinary and constitutional – across Europe, I investigate how judges negotiate and bargain to create final outcomes, and how the deliberative process itself may help to shape outcomes. Interview responses suggest two factors affect the probability that judges will be able to reach consensus outcomes: the complexity of the case and the background of the case rapporteur. These interview responses are then paired with an original dataset of case outcomes from seven European constitutional courts. The dataset of court outcomes suggests that the complexity of the case matters greatly, though limited testing shows judicial backgrounds do not appear to be a significant factor in the creation of consensus.



中文翻译:

共识决策:判断与司法审议的比较分析

摘要

本文试图对司法共识是如何形成的提供新的启示。通过对欧洲六个不同法院(包括普通法院和宪法法院)的法官和书记员的 17 次多国系列采访,我调查了法官如何通过谈判和讨价还价来创造最终结果,以及审议过程本身如何有助于塑造结果。采访回复表明,有两个因素会影响法官达成共识结果的可能性:案件的复杂性和案件报告员的背景。然后将这些采访回复与来自七个欧洲宪法法院的案件结果原始数据集配对。法庭结果数据集表明案件的复杂性非常重要,

更新日期:2020-12-17
down
wechat
bug