当前位置: X-MOL 学术British Journal of Social Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
From one new law to (many) new practices? Multidisciplinary teams re-constructing the meaning of a new disability law
British Journal of Social Psychology ( IF 6.920 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-24 , DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12428
Sabine Caillaud 1 , Valérie Haas 1 , Paula Castro 2
Affiliation  

This paper explores how a new French law incorporating a new conceptualization of disability formulated at the international level by the WHO is appropriated at the local level by multidisciplinary teams of professionals in charge of the assessment of disability. Drawing on social representations theory, its concept of cognitive polyphasia and its conceptualization of legal innovation, the paper specifically examines how the teams deal with the tensions between the old and the new models of disability and how the group dynamic is associated with how they do this: by hybridization of old and new models, by selective prevalence according to context, or by displacement of one model. Focus groups with the teams (n = 65 from 10 groups), analysed with indicators of interaction, bring evidence of the three forms. They show how different groups, by drawing differently, depending on their relational dynamics, from a variety of meaning systems circulating at the cultural level, reach different decisions that may lead to different practices in the local implementation of the same laws. We finish by discussing how social representations theory, linking the cultural/global and the interactional/local levels, can enhance our understanding of how socio-psychological processes intervening in the appropriation of legal innovations may produce different practical implementations of the same new laws.

中文翻译:

从一项新法律到(许多)新做法?多学科团队重新构建新残疾法的含义

本文探讨了一项新的法国法律,该法律纳入了世界卫生组织在国际层面制定的新的残疾概念,如何在地方层面被负责残疾评估的多学科专业团队采用。借鉴社会表征理论、其认知多相概念及其对法律创新的概念化,本文具体研究了团队如何处理新旧残疾模式之间的紧张关系,以及团队动力如何与他们如何做到这一点相关联。 :通过新旧模型的混合,根据上下文选择性流行,或通过替换一个模型。与团队的焦点小组 ( n = 65 来自 10 组),用交互指标分析,带来三种形式的证据。它们展示了不同的群体如何根据他们的关系动态,从文化层面传播的各种意义系统中做出不同的决定,从而做出不同的决定,这些决定可能导致在地方实施相同法律时产生不同的做法。我们最后讨论了社会表征理论如何将文化/全球和互动/地方层面联系起来,可以增强我们对干预法律创新占用的社会心理过程如何可能产生相同新法律的不同实际实施的理解。
更新日期:2020-11-24
down
wechat
bug