Nahari, Vrij, and Fischer [(2014b), Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 122–128] found that, when participants were forewarned that their statements would be checked for verifiable details, truth tellers gave much more verifiable details than liars. In this direct replication (n = 72), participants wrote a statement claiming they had carried out their regular campus activities, whereas liars had actually stolen an exam. Statements were coded for verifiable details. Our primary prediction was confirmed: Truth tellers provided significantly more verifiable details than liars. Of note, the replication effect size (d = 0.49) was less than half that of the original (d = 1.14), and – like in the original study – was smaller than the lie‐truth effect size for total details (verifiable and unverifiable details combined; d = 0.80). We hope this will stimulate other independent investigations of VA to tell whether or not coding for verifiability will pass Ockham's razor test.

中文翻译：

---

欺骗检测的可验证性方法：预先注册的Nahari，Vrij和Fisher的信息协议条件的直接复制（2014b）

Nahari，Vrij和Fischer [（2014b），《应用认知心理学》，第28卷，第122-128页）发现，如果预先警告参与者将对他们的陈述进行核对，则真相讲述者会比说谎者提供更多可核实的细节。在这种直接复制中（n = 72），参与者写了一份声明，声称他们已经进行了常规的校园活动，而说谎者实际上却偷了考试。语句已编码为可验证的详细信息。我们的主要预测得到了证实：真相算命者提供的信息比说谎者多得多。值得注意的是，复制效果的大小（d = 0.49）小于原始大小（d= 1.14），并且–如原始研究中所示–小于全部细节的真假影响大小（可验证和不可验证细节的总和；d = 0.80）。我们希望这将激发对VA的其他独立调查，以判断可验证性编码是否将通过Ockham的剃刀测试。