College students’ views on sexual consent are developed in discussion with their peers and impacted by the traditional sexual script. This script prescribes gender roles that encourage men's coercion and facilitate victim‐blame. This heteronormative script may be less applicable to sexual minority individuals during same‐gender sexual relationships and to gender minority individuals, who often hold more fluid views on gender. We examine the consent attitudes and perceived rape‐supportive peer norms of American gender and sexual minority (GSM) college students. Using archival data from a campus climate survey (N = 2040), we conducted a series of chi‐square analyses to compare student consent attitudes and perceptions of rape‐supportive peer norms by GSM status and gender. GSM students (vs. cisgender heterosexual students) and women and nonbinary people (vs. men) reported higher support for sexual consent. Having an identity that differs from the roles prescribed in traditional sexual scripts may confer an advantage in developing prosocial views of sexual consent.

中文翻译：

---

性别和性少数族裔学生的性同意态度和强奸支持规范

在与同龄人的讨论中，大学生对性同意的看法得到发展，并受到传统性文字的影响。该剧本规定了鼓励男子胁迫和助长受害人的性别角色。这种异类规范性脚本可能不太适用于在同性性关系期间的性少数群体个人和性别少数群体个体，后者通常对性别问题持有更多的看法。我们研究了美国性别和性少数（GSM）大学生的同意态度和感知到的强奸支持同伴规范。使用来自校园气候调查的档案数据（N= 2040年），我们进行了一系列卡方分析，以比较GSM状态和性别对学生同意态度和对强奸支持同伴规范的看法。GSM学生（与cisgender异性恋的学生相比）以及妇女和非二元性人（与男子相比）对性同意的支持更高。拥有与传统性爱剧本中规定的角色不同的身份，可能会有利于发展亲社会对性同意的看法。