当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Research in Personality › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Perceptions of daily sacrifice motives: Accuracy, bias, outcomes, and moderators
Journal of Research in Personality ( IF 3.886 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-18 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104045
Jessica E. LaBuda , Judith Gere

The current study examined accuracy and bias in perceptions of a partner’s daily approach and avoidance sacrifice motives, associations of bias with daily sacrificer and perceiver relationship quality, and moderators of accuracy (gender, relationship length, daily stress). 94 cohabiting couples completed daily measures of sacrifice (N = 375 days), stress, relationship satisfaction, and closeness. People showed evidence of accuracy for partner sacrifice motives, but accuracy for approach sacrifice depended on relationship length. People underperceived partner sacrifice motives; underperception of approach sacrifice was associated with greater sacrificer closeness, while overperception of approach sacrifice and overperception of avoidance sacrifice was associated with greater perceiver closeness, although these effects were small. Gender and stress did not moderate tracking accuracy or mean-level bias.



中文翻译:

日常牺牲动机的感知:准确性,偏见,结果和主持人

当前的研究检查了对伴侣的日常方法和避免牺牲动机的理解的准确性和偏见,偏执与日常牺牲者和知觉者关系质量的关联以及准确性的调节者(性别,关系长度,日常压力)。94对同居夫妇完成了每天的牺牲措施(N = 375天),压力,关系满意度和亲密感。人们显示出伙伴牺牲动机的准确性的证据,但是进近牺牲的准确性取决于关系的长度。人们对伴侣牺牲动机的理解不足;尽管这些影响很小,但对进场牺牲的感知不足与更大的牺牲者亲密性相关,而对进场牺牲的感知过度与对回避牺牲的过度感知与更高感知者亲密性相关,尽管这些影响很小。性别和压力并没有降低追踪的准确性或平均水平的偏见。

更新日期:2020-12-23
down
wechat
bug