How can we maximize what is learned from a replication study? In the creative destruction approach to replication, the original hypothesis is compared not only to the null hypothesis, but also to predictions derived from multiple alternative theoretical accounts of the phenomenon. To this end, new populations and measures are included in the design in addition to the original ones, to help determine which theory best accounts for the results across multiple key outcomes and contexts. The present pre-registered empirical project compared the Implicit Puritanism account of intuitive work and sex morality to theories positing regional, religious, and social class differences; explicit rather than implicit cultural differences in values; self-expression vs. survival values as a key cultural fault line; the general moralization of work; and false positive effects. Contradicting Implicit Puritanism's core theoretical claim of a distinct American work morality, a number of targeted findings replicated across multiple comparison cultures, whereas several failed to replicate in all samples and were identified as likely false positives. No support emerged for theories predicting regional variability and specific individual-differences moderators (religious affiliation, religiosity, and education level). Overall, the results provide evidence that work is intuitively moralized across cultures.

我们如何才能最大化从复制研究中学到的知识？在创造性破坏性复制方法中，不仅将原始假设与原假设进行比较，而且还将其与从该现象的多种替代理论解释中得出的预测进行比较。为此，设计中除了原始设计之外还包括了新的设计和应用，以帮助确定哪种理论最能说明多个关键成果和背景下的结果。当前预先注册的经验项目将隐性清教主义对直觉工作和性道德的解释与假定地区，宗教和社会阶级差异的理论进行了比较。价值观的显式而非隐式文化差异；自我表达与生存价值观是关键的文化断层线；工作的总体道德化；和误报效应。与隐式清教主义的核心理论主张不同的美国工作道德背道而驰，许多针对性的发现在多种比较文化中得以复制，而有些则未能在所有样本中复制，并被确定为可能的假阳性。预测区域差异和特定个体差异主持人（宗教信仰，宗教信仰和教育水平）的理论没有得到支持。总体而言，结果提供了证据，表明工作在不同文化中都具有直觉上的道德感。预测区域差异和特定个体差异主持人（宗教信仰，宗教信仰和教育水平）的理论没有得到支持。总体而言，结果提供了证据，表明工作在不同文化中都具有直觉上的道德感。预测区域差异和特定个体差异主持人（宗教信仰，宗教信仰和教育水平）的理论没有得到支持。总体而言，结果提供了证据，表明工作在不同文化中都具有直觉上的道德感。