当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Experimental Social Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Different punishment systems in a public goods game with asymmetric endowments
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology ( IF 3.532 ) Pub Date : 2020-12-11 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104096
Laila Nockur , Stefan Pfattheicher , Johannes Keller

Punishment has been shown to increase cooperation in public goods dilemmas when resources to contribute are distributed symmetrically. The present investigation examines which punishment system (peer punishment, democratic punishment, and central punishment) in comparison to a system without punishment fosters cooperation in a social dilemma when resources to contribute are distributed asymmetrically among the actors involved. Participants (N = 212) took part in a public goods game under each of four punishment conditions: peer punishment, democratic punishment, central punishment, and no punishment. Whereas in symmetric groups all group members received the same endowment that they could contribute to the public good, in asymmetric groups two advantaged group members received larger endowments compared to two disadvantaged group members. The availability of punishment increased substantially the average relative contribution, as well as satisfaction and fairness ratings across punishment systems, in both asymmetric and symmetric groups. There was only limited evidence that the punishment systems had differential effects in asymmetric versus symmetric groups or depending on the status of advantaged versus disadvantaged. Implications for the use of punishment to foster cooperation in social dilemmas when resources to contribute are distributed asymmetrically are discussed.



中文翻译:

symmetric赋不对称的公益博弈中的不同惩罚制度

事实证明,当贡献的资源对称分配时,惩罚会增加公共物品两难的合作。本调查研究了在不涉及参与者的参与者之间非对称分配资源的情况下,与没有惩罚的系统相比,哪种惩罚系统(同等惩罚,民主惩罚和中央惩罚)在社会困境中促进了合作。参加人数 = 212)在以下四种惩罚条件中的每一种条件下参加了公益游戏:同伴惩罚,民主惩罚,中央惩罚和无惩罚。在对称的群体中,所有群体成员都获得了可以为公共利益做出贡献的end赋,而在不对称的群体中,与两个处于不利地位的群体成员相比,两个处于有利地位的群体成员获得了更大的捐赠。在不对称和对称群体中,惩罚的可用性大大提高了整个惩罚系统的平均相对贡献以及满意度和公平等级。仅有有限的证据表明,惩罚制度在不对称群体和对称群体中或在有利条件和不利条件的地位上有不同的作用。

更新日期:2020-12-23
down
wechat
bug