当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Law & Social Inquiry
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Penal (Ant)Agonism
Law & Social Inquiry ( IF 1.396 ) Pub Date : 2019-07-18 , DOI: 10.1017/lsi.2019.32 Johann Koehler
Law & Social Inquiry ( IF 1.396 ) Pub Date : 2019-07-18 , DOI: 10.1017/lsi.2019.32 Johann Koehler
In Breaking the Pendulum , Goodman, Page, and Phelps (2017) advance an “agonistic” perspective that contends struggle drives penal change, and that it does so through perpetual conflict. Yet studying only manifest struggles, when an actor made their resistance to a penal status quo known, presents thorny problems in conceptualizing conflict. One such problem is that conflict among agonists advocating competing penal policies presupposes consensus between those who threaten penal order’s basic conditions. Understanding penal agonism’s corollary, penal antagonism, offers a more complete starting point from which to theorize penal history and penality.
中文翻译:
刑事(蚂蚁)激动
在打破钟摆 、Goodman、Page 和 Phelps(2017 年)提出了一种“竞争性”观点,认为斗争推动了刑事变革,并且通过永久冲突来实现。然而,只研究明显的斗争,当一个演员公开他们对刑事现状的抵抗时,在概念化冲突方面会遇到棘手的问题。一个这样的问题是,倡导相互竞争的刑罚政策的积极分子之间的冲突以威胁刑罚秩序基本条件的人之间的共识为前提。理解刑罚对抗的推论,刑罚对抗,为刑罚历史和刑罚理论化提供了一个更完整的起点。
更新日期:2019-07-18
中文翻译:
刑事(蚂蚁)激动
在