for example, through suggestions as to how spaces may be modified to become more accessible and inclusive, suggestions that may be valuable to those involved in designing spaces with an awareness of preserving the individual identities of the communities that access them. This not only adds authority to the chapters, but transforms them from academic documents to potential contributions to public policy manifestos, appealing to a multi-disciplinary audience while staying grounded in discourse-related methods. There is an inherent coherence throughout the volume and the chapters have been clearly chosen and edited to be comparable while avoiding repetition. However, there is a lack of a sense of each part building towards some defining contribution to the field; a culminating chapter by the editor synthesising the suggestions made by the authors would have been a welcome addition. Despite this, the volume makes a bold attempt influence to public policy and space design by presenting suggestions as to how they can be adapted to be more inclusive, which draws the unfortunate question as to whether it will attract the attention of those in a position to implement them beyond the parameters of academia. This book warrants such attention, but also provides a worthy framework for researchers interested in transforming studies in discourse into documents that present societal reforms.

中文翻译：

---

书评：埃里克·罗素 (Eric Russell)，《恐同症的话语生态学：揭开欧洲极右翼的反 LGBTQ 演讲》

例如，通过关于如何修改空间以使其更易于访问和包容的建议，这些建议对于参与设计空间并意识到保护访问它们的社区的个人身份的人来说可能是有价值的。这不仅增加了章节的权威性，而且将它们从学术文件转变为对公共政策宣言的潜在贡献，在保持与话语相关的方法的基础上吸引了多学科的受众。整卷具有内在的连贯性，并且章节经过明确选择和编辑，在避免重复的同时具有可比性。然而，缺乏对每个部分都在对该领域做出一些决定性贡献的感觉；编辑综合作者提出的建议的最后一章将是一个受欢迎的补充。尽管如此，该卷对公共政策和空间设计进行了大胆的尝试，提出了如何调整它们以使其更具包容性的建议，这引发了一个不幸的问题，即它是否会吸引那些有能力的人的注意在学术界之外实施它们。本书值得如此关注，但也为有兴趣将话语研究转化为呈现社会改革的文件的研究人员提供了一个有价值的框架。这引起了一个令人遗憾的问题，即它是否会吸引那些能够在学术界之外实施它们的人的注意力。本书值得如此关注，但也为有兴趣将话语研究转化为呈现社会改革的文件的研究人员提供了一个有价值的框架。这引起了一个令人遗憾的问题，即它是否会吸引那些能够在学术界之外实施它们的人的注意力。本书值得如此关注，但也为有兴趣将话语研究转化为呈现社会改革的文件的研究人员提供了一个有价值的框架。