Dialogical single case studies involve mutually interdependent relations between humans in their real locations and in real time (here-and-now). Mikhail Bakhtin explored such relations in terms of chronotopes, i.e. as indivisible units serving as analytical tools for the study of dynamic processes in literature. We argue that chronotopic thinking also serves as an epistemological and ethical organising principle of human activities in daily thinking, knowing, actions and communication. This article explores different types of chronotopic thinking in dialogical single case studies, such as routines and changes; bildungsromans and heteroglossia; and values, meanings and intensities of these chronotopes in different time-scale situations. Considering ethical and dynamic interdependencies between the participants, this article suggests in what ways knowledge obtained in dialogical single case studies could be transferred (extended, generalised, resituated) to other kinds of studies.

中文翻译：

---

计时表

对话式单一案例研究涉及人类在其真实位置和实时（此时此地）之间相互依赖的关系。米哈伊尔·巴赫金（Mikhail Bakhtin）从时间表的角度探讨了这种关系，即作为不可分割的单位，用作研究文学动态过程的分析工具。我们认为，时间同步思维也是人类日常思考、认识、行动和交流活动的认识论和伦理组织原则。本文探讨了对话式单一案例研究中不同类型的时位思维，例如惯例和变化；成长小说和杂语；以及这些计时表在不同时间尺度情况下的价值、意义和强度。考虑到参与者之间的道德和动态相互依存关系，