It has become commonplace within disability sociolegal scholarship to argue that, in the last 30 years, a new legal and policy approach to disability has emerged, leading to a paradigm shift from a social protection framework to an antidiscrimination model. Some authors have stressed, however, that the new model has not fully replaced the older social protection approach. Yet little is still known about how the coexistence of these different models impacts on the everyday experience of disability in the workplace and on potential legal mobilization. Based on interviews with workers with disabilities who mobilized the law to obtain reasonable accommodation in Belgium combined with an analysis of evolving Belgian legal schemes relating to disability, this article explores how interactions between social, labor, and antidiscrimination rights shape legal mobilization of persons with disabilities in the workplace. We find that individual's initial self‐identification as workers or persons with disabilities influences how they frame their claim and the kind of legal norms they refer to in a first stage but that both their identification and their rights consciousness evolve and change through the course of legal mobilization as they interact with various professionals and navigate between the different concepts and rights available in current law.

中文翻译：

---

在法律变化和持续排斥之间的残疾工人：矛盾的权利如何塑造法律动员

在残疾社会法律学术界，人们普遍认为，在过去 30 年中，出现了一种新的残疾法律和政策方法，导致范式从社会保护框架转向反歧视模式。然而，一些作者强调，新模式并没有完全取代旧的社会保护方法。然而，对于这些不同模式的共存如何影响工作场所的日常残疾体验和潜在的法律动员，人们仍然知之甚少。基于对动员法律在比利时获得合理便利的残疾工人的采访，并结合对比利时与残疾相关的不断发展的法律计划的分析，本文探讨了社会、劳工、和反歧视权利塑造了残疾人在工作场所的合法动员。我们发现，个人最初对工人或残疾人的自我认同会影响他们在第一阶段提出主张的方式和所指的法律规范的类型，但他们的认同和权利意识都随着法律的进程而演变和变化。他们与各种专业人士互动并在现行法律中可用的不同概念和权利之间导航。