当前位置: X-MOL 学术Juvenile and Family Court Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
An Assessment of Judges’ Self‐Reported Experiences of Secondary Traumatic Stress
Juvenile and Family Court Journal ( IF 0.556 ) Pub Date : 2019-06-06 , DOI: 10.1111/jfcj.12134
Charles P. Edwards , Monica K. Miller

Many judges experience occupation‐specific stress, such as secondary traumatic stress (STS), burnout, compassion fatigue, and vicarious traumatization. A content analysis of 762 judges’ open‐ended responses to a survey asking whether they had suffered from STS revealed that judges moderately experienced most types of stress. Some case types (e.g., family court) and some job aspects (e.g., gruesome evidence) were particularly stressful. Judges reported both positive (e.g., social support) and negative (e.g., distractions) coping mechanisms. Interventions should be tailored to judges’ characteristics, (e.g., gender), job (e.g., family court), beliefs (e.g., that STS does not exist), and level of distress.

中文翻译:

法官自我报告的继发性创伤压力评估

许多法官会经历特定于职业的压力,例如继发性外伤压力(STS),倦怠,同情疲劳和替代性外伤。对762名法官对调查是否开放性调查的不限成员名额答复的内容分析表明,法官中等程度地承受了大多数压力。某些案件类型(例如,家庭法院)和某些工作方面(例如,令人毛骨悚然的证据)尤其令人感到压力。法官报告了积极的(例如,社会支持)和消极的(例如,分心)应对机制。干预措施应根据法官的特征(例如性别),工作(例如家庭法院),信念(例如不存在STS)和痛苦程度来量身定制。
更新日期:2019-06-06
down
wechat
bug