当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Philosophy of Education › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Educational Goods and the Ethical Dimensions of Educational Policy and Practice
Journal of Philosophy of Education ( IF 0.949 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-26 , DOI: 10.1111/1467-9752.12510
RANDALL CURREN

This essay is a commentary on Brighouse, Ladd, Loeb and Swift's Educational Goods: Values, Evidence, and Decision‐Making. It discusses the book's conceptualisation of childhood goods, and it comments at length on its place within the larger philosophical enterprise of promoting normatively and evidentially sound decision‐making in education. A thesis of the commentary is that the book provides an important form of orientation to educational policy decision‐making, but that the goods and distributive values it identifies would need to be supplemented in order to adequately address aspects of educational practice beyond the kinds of policy matters it discusses. These would include the content of education, the scope and division of educational authority, and the manner in which such authority should be exercised, for example pedagogically, in shaping student conduct, and in communicating and implementing educational policies.

中文翻译:

教育商品与教育政策与实践的道德层面

本文是对Brighouse,Ladd,Loeb和Swift的《教育产品:价值,证据和决策》的评论。它讨论了这本书中有关童年物品的概念,并详细评论了它在较大的哲学事业中的地位,该事业促进了规范和证据上合理的教育决策制定。评论的论点是,这本书为教育政策的决策提供了一种重要的形式,但是它所标识的商品和分配价值需要加以补充,以充分解决政策种类之外的教育实践方面的问题。它讨论的问题。这些内容包括教育的内容,教育权威的范围和划分,以及在教学中,例如在塑造学生行为,沟通和实施教育政策时应行使这种权威的方式。
更新日期:2020-09-26
down
wechat
bug