In this study, we examined how different types of interviewing (eliciting more complete vs. less complete accounts) used in an interview conducted shortly after an event affected truth tellers' and liars' responses when they were interviewed again after a two‐week delay. Participants (n = 80) were shown a mock intelligence operation video and told either the truth or lied about its contents in two interviews, immediately after watching the video, and after a two‐week delay. In the immediate interview participants were instructed either to report everything they remembered, or asked spatial questions related to the event. In the delayed interview, all participants were asked to report everything. The differences between truth tellers and liars were slightly larger in the report everything than in the spatial questions condition. Results suggest that an immediate “report everything” instruction can aid to effectively discriminate between truthful and deceptive accounts.

中文翻译：

---

重复采访中的欺骗检测：立即提问类型对延迟帐户的影响

在这项研究中，我们调查了事件发生后不久进行的采访中使用的不同类型的采访（引发更完整和较不完整的帐户）如何影响真相讲述者和说谎者两周的延迟后再次接受采访。参加人数= 80）在观看视频后立即延迟了两周，并在两次采访中向他们展示了一个模拟的情报操作视频，并告诉了他们事实或谎言。在立即面试中，参与者被指示要么报告他们记得的一切，要么被问及与事件有关的空间问题。在延迟的访谈中，要求所有参与者报告所有情况。在报告中，真相讲述者和撒谎者之间的差异比在空间问题条件下要大得多。结果表明，立即执行“报告一切”指令可以帮助有效区分真实和欺骗性陈述。