当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Educational Measurement › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Integrating Multiple Sources of Validity Evidence for an Assessment‐Based Cognitive Model
Journal of Educational Measurement ( IF 1.188 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-08 , DOI: 10.1111/jedm.12245
Thomas Langenfeld 1 , Jay Thomas 1 , Rongchun Zhu 1 , Carrie A. Morris 1
Affiliation  

An assessment of graphic literacy was developed by articulating and subsequently validating a skills‐based cognitive model intended to substantiate the plausibility of score interpretations. Model validation involved use of multiple sources of evidence derived from large‐scale field testing and cognitive labs studies. Data from large‐scale field testing were evaluated using traditional psychometric methods. The psychometric analyses were augmented using eye tracking technology to perform gaze pattern and pupillometry analyses to gain better understanding of problem‐solving strategies and cognitive load. Findings from the data sources were integrated to provide strong evidence supporting the model and score interpretations. Implications for using gaze pattern and pupillometry analyses to enhance learning and assessment are discussed.

中文翻译:

综合基于评估的认知模型的有效证据来源

通过阐明并随后验证旨在证实分数解释的合理性的基于技能的认知模型,开发了图形素养评估。模型验证涉及使用来自大规模现场测试和认知实验室研究的多种证据来源。使用传统的心理测量方法评估了来自大规模现场测试的数据。使用眼动追踪技术对心理分析进行了增强,以进行注视模式和瞳孔分析,以更好地理解问题解决策略和认知负荷。整合了来自数据源的发现,以提供强有力的证据来支持模型和分数解释。讨论了使用注视模式和瞳孔分析来增强学习和评估的含义。
更新日期:2019-09-08
down
wechat
bug