当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Consumer Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Identity‐Based Motivation and the Logic of Conversations Obfuscate Loss of Online Privacy and What Policy‐Makers Can Do About It
Journal of Consumer Psychology ( IF 4.551 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-02 , DOI: 10.1002/jcpy.1189
Daphna Oyserman 1 , Norbert Schwarz 1
Affiliation  

People care about their privacy, but when they are online, they do not act as if they do. We apply the psychology of meaning‐making to shed light on why that is. Acquisti, Loewenstein, and Brandimarte (2020) review of factors relevant to gaps between privacy attitudes and behaviors highlights both the importance of the problem of online privacy and its intractability, given current thinking about what can be done. Connecting their discussion with the psychology of meaning‐making, operationalized by integrating identity‐based motivation theory with the logic of communication and anthropomorphizing, this commentary addresses why people narrowly conceptualize what privacy they are losing and fail to act as if privacy matters, as well as what can be done about it at a policy level.

中文翻译:

基于身份的动机和对话逻辑模糊了在线隐私的丢失以及政策制定者对此可以采取的措施

人们在乎自己的隐私,但是当他们在线时,他们的行为就不像他们那样。我们运用意义创造的心理学来阐明其原因。Acquisti,Loewenstein和Brandimarte(2020)对与隐私态度和行为之间的差距相关的因素进行了回顾,并指出了在线隐私问题的重要性及其难处理性,因为目前正在考虑可以采取的措施。通过将基于身份的动机理论与交流和拟人化逻辑相结合,使他们的讨论与意义创造的心理学联系起来,这篇评论解决了人们为什么狭义地概念化了他们正在失去的隐私,以及无法像隐私一样重要地行动作为在策略级别可以采取的措施。
更新日期:2020-11-02
down
wechat
bug